Guncotton - A personal look at films

Once upon a time there was a Queen that lived in a big palace. She had ruled the country for many years and was respected by her subjects. After so long in the throne, she was convinced of having achieved a good insight on how her people thought and felt about a good number of issues and, particularly, about all things Royal. She was also certain that, in the face of turmoil and unrest, her subjects would expect her to behave as she had done for the past 30 years: showing dignity, reserve and discretion.

Little did she know...

A fictionalisation of the emotional outburst that followed the death of Princess Diana in 1997 and its consequences for the British Monarchy, "The Queen" is actually a reflection on how one single event can be perceived in two very different ways. After learning about Diana's death, the Queen is adamant that the funeral obsequies should be a "family" matter and insists that the "boys" (i.e., the young Princes) should be taken away from all the fuss that the media is making. Her loyal subjects, on the other side, have different ideas: Diana was very close to people, they said; she was one of them and for that reason, the Monarchy should make the appropriate noises and arrange a proper - and very public - farewell to the "Princess of the People". The conflict between these two views causes a gap between the British public and their Sovereign that grows wider by the hour and threatens to seriously undermine the Monarchy.

Enter newly elected Prime Minister, Tony Blair, all enthusiasm and youthful energy, to deal with this delicate and unexpected crisis. After a first encounter where it's clear that Mr. Blair is fascinated by the Queen, but she appears to be less than impressed with the PM du jour - she used to discuss affairs of State with Sir Winston Churchill, after all - a shift in the balance of power starts to happen.

By remaining set in her views about not giving in to sentimentality and chest-beating in public, Elisabeth II quickly loses ground - and popularity - whereas Tony Blair is saluted as the leader who has truly understood the impact that the late Princess had in ordinary people's lives. In the end and to prevent further damage, she is advised to make a public gesture to show that she cares. "Openness" is the key here, since emotion is not such unless is witnessed by others, broadcasted and displayed in front of an audience that needs reassurance as a way to validate their own feelings. For someone who has spent most of her life repressing any manifestation of emotion in public, that suggestion must have sounded almost pornographic.

Does the Queen relent in the end? Well, I am sure that many of you listened to the Queen's speech about Diana's death. Many of you, too, most likely remember the almost unnoticeable tilt of the Queens's head when Diana's hearse passed by the gates of Buckingham Palace. The Queen stood there, along with other members of the Royal Family presenting their respects to the mortal remains of one of her ex-daughters-in-law. The film covers some of those moments and offers its personal interpretation of the Queen's feelings at the time.

If at this point you think that this is your proverbial afternoon TV movie, I have to say it isn't. The film is not some pandering about the glamour of being a crowned head. It is not an immersion on the collective grief that followed the death of Diana. It is, in fact, a superb and subtle study of a character incapable of reacting to other people's emotions and therefore, at great risk of misunderstanding everything that happens around her. Since she no longer understands what is going on, she clings to her old certainties, only to discover - even when she cannot admit it to anyone - that they will not help her in this circumstance.

The film, however, does not judge Elisabeth II, nor the UK people that felt that Diana's death deserved stronger acknowledgement. It does not judge Tony Blair, either, with his growing admiration for a woman that has stayed so long in office that she regards politicians as nothing more than seasonal sensations, exciting to discover, but not made to last. The movie simply explains the motivations that the different sides have to act the way they do and how all struggled to get their views to prevail.

What the film also says, I think, is that choosing to misread the mood of a nation is a dangerous thing and that it may lead to unexpected consequences. Watching the movie it occured to me that a lesson could be learnt from the whole experience: to survive in any situation it is essential to distinguish between what one thinks is the right thing to do and what is the right thing to do in that moment. Of course, if one is lucky enough to have in their team a natural born empathiser and mood-reader of the masses, such as Mr. Blair, the odds of winning the battle for the hearts and minds of the people are much, much higher.

In the end, the Queen, being the Queen and having to win (and lose) in her own terms, allows herself an interesting oracular moment. After all the frenzy is gone and the reconciliation with the Queen and her subjects has taken place, Tony Blair visits Elisabeth II again. This time, he is completely at ease in his role as PM and terribly proud of himself and of his dealing with the situation. The Queen, still annoyed by her emotional strip-tease of earlier, addresses him coldly and offers him a piece of wisdom that has a very current ring to it: the public is whimsical in their choice of heroes and it arrives to everybody the day when one mutates from beloved leader into national disappointment. He may well remember that, for it will happen to him one day too.

And with such settling of the score, they both take a walk in the gardens of the Palace, each of them back into their own place again, each of them determined never to leave it for a second time.